Cit vs suresh chandra mittal

Author: omxg

August undefined, 2024

WebApr 15, 2012 · Contrast with Suresh Chandra Mittal 241 ITR 124 (MP) affirmed in 251 ITR 9 (SC) & CIT vs. Rajiv Garg 313 ITR 256 (P&H) & SAS Pharmaceuticals 335 ITR 176 … WebSuresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC) He also relied upon the decision of ITAT, Bangalore in the following cases: IT Appeal No. 3480 (Bang.) of 2004 in the case of V. Krishnamurty v. Income Tax Officer dated 31-3-2005, IT Appeal No. 178 (Panaji) of 2002 in the case of Asstt. CIT v. G.L. Acharya dated 1-4-2005.

Dr.S.Duraiswamy, Chennai vs Department Of Income Tax - Indian …

WebJul 6, 2016 · The Hon'ble Supreme Court has in fact confirmed the order of Madhya Pradesh High Court in CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal in which Hon'ble High Court had held that in this case the surrender was made after persistent queries made by the AO. Still, it was held by the Court that no penalty should be leived. bke aiden boot cut

cit vs suresh chandra mittal 251 itr 9 income tax income tax

Webcit vs suresh chandra mittal 251 itr 9 income tax income tax F: Deleration in Annexure v F: Applicability of GST F: Switching Over From Regular to Composition Scheme F: Input … WebApr 24, 2015 · In case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of … Web1) "CIT v Suraj Bhan 159 Taxman 26 P & H - penalty cannot be imposed merely on account of higher income having been subsequently declared. In his case, the 7 ITA Nos. 858 to 863/Mds/2011assessee had filed the revised return showing higher income and gave an b kearns code atlra

DCIT, CHENNAI v. R.Revathy, CHENNAI Income Tax Appellate …

CIT vs. M/s Sangameshwara Associates (Karnataka High Court)

WebC.R. Nagappa vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 4 September, 1968. ... vs Asstt. Cit on 21 May, 2004. Warning on Translation. User Queries. income tax returns . tax extender. … Web1 day ago · However, the AO initiated penalty proceeding under section 271 (1) (c) of the Act for concealment of income and finally levied the penalty which was also confirmed by the learned CIT (A). 10.1 It is a settled position of law that the penalty proceedings are different from assessment proceedings. bk eat like a king whos on a budget lyricsWebAug 12, 2024 · The assessee has relied on the following judgment. “Sale consideration offered for tax on receipt of notice u/s. 148 to buy peace of mind. Not proved by department that explanation of assessee was not bona fide Suresh Chandra Mittal relied SLP of dept dismissed In the case of CIT V/s. 1. Rajiv Garg 2. Siya Ram Garg 3. Sanjay Garg 4. bke burnout t-shirts

"WebThe assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2002-03 against the order of learned CIT(Appeals) dated 17th January, 2011 disputing the confirmation of penalty of Rs.2,91,552/- levied u/s 271(1)(c). ... The Tribunal after considering the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 deleted the ... " - Cit vs suresh chandra mittal

Cit vs suresh chandra mittal

Penalty u.s 271 (1)(C) Held High court Income Tax - CAclubindia

WebJan 30, 2024 · CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC) CIT vs. SAS pharmaceuticals (2011) 335 ITR 0259 (Del) CIT vs. Pushpendra Surana (2013) 96 DTR 0231 (Raj) In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the concealment penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). WebIn Suresh Chandra Goyal (Supra), Hon'ble High Court of Delhi observed: "59. Thus, when one party gives a security to the other, implicit in the said transaction is the …

Did you know?

Webcourt in the case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal(2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC), affirming the decision by the Madhya Pradesh High Court ( reported at 241 ITR 124 (MP)) wherein the returns admitting additional income filed beyond the time limit available for furnishing revised returns were not considered invalid on that score. Further, a similar issue, had WebMar 18, 2024 · In Suresh Chandra Mittal's case (supra) the Court came out with an epoch-making ruling, viz., if an assessee files a revised …

WebMay 2, 2015 · In case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of … Webvi. CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal(2000) 241 ITR 124 (MP) 2.2. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The facts, in brief, are that a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was carried out at the business premises of M/s Etco Group as well as at the

WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax vs Suresh Chandra Mittal on 26 July, 2001 User Queries ambal concealment of income undisclosed income revised return 153a penalty proceedings income tax returns suresh chandra mittal m. ambalal sureshchandra suresh chandra furnishing inaccurate particulars sec 153a penalty under section 271 1 c penalty u/s … Webcase of SureshChandra Mittal vs. CIT (Supra), the Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that the assessment was made by the Revenue and once the assessing authorities had failed to take any objection in the matter of surrender of income made by the assessee in his revised return, the explanation that he had

WebIn case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of mind …

Webcit vs suresh chandra mittal 251 itr 9 income tax income tax F: Deleration in Annexure v F: Applicability of GST F: Switching Over From Regular to Composition Scheme F: Input tax credit F: Transporter issuing builty required to take gst registration? F: Non Genration of E-way Bill or genration of Incorrect E-Way bill , Imp... daugherty body shopWebThe Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Suresh Chand Mittal, 251 ITR 9 (SC) held that in a case where the assessee originally filed return showing meager income, but after action u/s.132 in response to notice u/s.148, the assessee filed revised return showing higher income and the eventual assessments were based on such return, penalty … bke cargo pantsWebIn this connection, in the case of Suresh Chandra Mittal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Hon'ble M.P. High Court in CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal [2000] 241 ITR 124, wherein it was held that " The Revenue did not at all discharge the burden to prove that there was concealment of income by the assessee. daugherty blue electraWebproceedings are not conclusive. The decision in CIT vs. Suresh Chand Mittal(251 ITR 9) (SC) further fortifies the case of the assessee. In the present appeal, when the wrong claim/mistake was brought to the notice of the assessee, that too, during assessment proceedings itself (before passing the assessment order), the assessee paid the due taxes, bke athletic fit shortsWebCommissioner Of Income-Tax vs Suresh Chandra Mittal on 26 July, 2001 Section 133(6) in The Income- Tax Act, 1995 Warning on Translation User Queries long terms capital gains stock exchange revised return bogus Revise income income or capital gains sale of share penalty proceedings suresh chandra mittal section 133(6) sureshchandra suresh … bke-conceptsWebAfter going through the letter of the ITO, the CIT (Appeals) held that Lotus Mills Ltd. would get a heavy refund from the Income Tax Department and it would be in a position to … bked200 eatonWebJul 26, 2001 · CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal – Supreme Court of India TG Team Income Tax - Judiciary Download PDF 26 Jul 2001 9,245 Views 0 comment Case Law Details … bk easy induction hapjespan 28 cm